Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
Gastroenterol. hepatol. (Ed. impr.) ; 40(5): 363-374, mayo 2017. tab, graf, ilus
Artigo em Espanhol | IBECS | ID: ibc-162786

RESUMO

En los últimos años se han producido avances en el manejo de la hemorragia digestiva alta no varicosa que han permitido disminuir la recidiva hemorrágica y la mortalidad. El presente documento de posicionamiento de la Societat Catalana de Digestologia es una actualización de las recomendaciones basadas en la evidencia sobre el manejo de la hemorragia digestiva por úlcera péptica


In recent years there have been advances in the management of non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding that have helped reduce rebleeding and mortality. This document positioning of the Catalan Society of Digestologia is an update of evidence-based recommendations on management of gastrointestinal bleeding peptic ulcer


Assuntos
Humanos , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/terapia , Úlcera Péptica Hemorrágica/terapia , Padrões de Prática Médica , Prática Clínica Baseada em Evidências , Endoscopia Gastrointestinal , Transtornos da Coagulação Sanguínea/tratamento farmacológico , Prognóstico , Infecções por Helicobacter/tratamento farmacológico , Soluções Esclerosantes/administração & dosagem
2.
Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 40(5): 363-374, 2017 May.
Artigo em Inglês, Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28109636
3.
World J Gastroenterol ; 23(47): 8405-8414, 2017 Dec 21.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29308000

RESUMO

AIM: To evaluate the rate of adverse events (AEs) during consecutive gastric and duodenal polypectomies in several Spanish centers. METHODS: Polypectomies of protruded gastric or duodenal polyps ≥ 5 mm using hot snare were prospectively included. Prophylactic measures of hemorrhage were allowed in predefined cases. AEs were defined and graded according to the lexicon recommended by the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Patients were followed for 48 h, one week and 1 mo after the procedure. RESULTS: 308 patients were included and a single polypectomy was performed in 205. Only 36 (11.7%) were on prior anticoagulant therapy. Mean polyp size was 15 ± 8.9 mm (5-60) and in 294 cases (95.4%) were located in the stomach. Hemorrhage prophylaxis was performed in 219 (71.1%) patients. Nine patients presented AEs (2.9%), and 6 of them were bleeding (n = 6, 1.9%) (in 5 out of 6 AE, different types of endoscopic treatment were performed). Other 24 hemorrhagic episodes could be managed without any change in the outcome of the endoscopy and, consequently, were considered incidents. We did not find any independent risk factor of bleeding. CONCLUSION: Gastroduodenal polypectomy using prophylactic measures has a rate of AEs small enough to consider this procedure a safe and effective method for polyp resection independently of the polyp size and location.


Assuntos
Duodenopatias/cirurgia , Endoscopia Gastrointestinal/efeitos adversos , Microcirurgia/efeitos adversos , Pólipos/cirurgia , Hemorragia Pós-Operatória/epidemiologia , Gastropatias/cirurgia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Duodeno/patologia , Duodeno/cirurgia , Endoscopia Gastrointestinal/métodos , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Microcirurgia/métodos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Hemorragia Pós-Operatória/etiologia , Hemorragia Pós-Operatória/terapia , Estudos Prospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Espanha , Estômago/patologia , Estômago/cirurgia , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...